The higher end of the spectrum
screaming_slave
read my profile
sign my guestbook

Visit screaming_slave's Xanga Site!

Name: Screaming
Birthday: 7/10/1980
Gender: Female


Interests: rock/industrial/electronic music; tim burton/david lynch films; travel; badminton; dragon boat
Expertise: damned if i know
Occupation: Student
Industry: Education/Research


Message: message me


Member Since: 6/14/2003

SubscriptionsSites I Read
mermaid_in_jeans
theretardeddrunkencousin
kiddo_smiley
ShekShea_Lady
Kbross

Posting Calendar

|<< oldest | newest >>|
view all weblog archives

Get Involved!

Suggest a link

Recommend to friend

Create a site


Sunday, November 27, 2005

*knock, bang, knock*, I'm shaking the front door to school.  It's June.  Gotta get my stuff outta that locker, or "it'll be thrown away", according to the flyers posted around the hallways. I was always the type to take things seriously.  But now the doors were locked.  How could I get in? 

I peered through the door window just as the security guard walked up.  He unlocked the door, with a strangely exagerrated smile on his face.  I slipped in and thanked him.  I was glad not to have just wasted half an hour walking there for nothing. 

"I am so glad you're here", he said to me.  To a naive, 15 year-old girl, that's actually a compliment.  He was the security guard that would pass by me while I was sitting at the foot of my locker.  He would walk by me at least five times every time I decided to stay late afterschool to do my homework.  I preferred the late bus.  It used to take me straight home.  I could hear him turn the corner every 20 minutes or so..."gosh, he's good at doing his rounds", I would think to myself.  He would look down with that same exagerrated smile, and say hello or nod. 

"I'm here to clean out my locker, is that alright?  I have to do it now or they will clean it out for me."

"Yes, yes of course.  I am so glad you're here."

"Ok, well I have to do that then go."  I walked towards my locker. 

"Ok, well come find me when you're done".  I obviously had no intention of finding him.  He was starting to creep me out.

I hurried to my locker, threw out what I didn't need and took what I needed, slammed the locker door shut and headed for the front.

He caught me.  "You're not going now, are you?  I'm so lonely here.  Come,"  he took me by the arm and looked about.  The only private place he could find was the cafeteria.  He sat me down.

"I really have to go though..."

He continued, "I think about you all the time.  I didn't know when I was going to see you again," he must have seen the fear on my face. He told me not to be scared. 

I honestly can't remember what else was said, I was paralyzed.  He took my hand and started to kiss it, then moved up my arm.  I pulled away.  He told me it was ok.  I didn't leave.  I didn't run.  I didn't kick him. 

He started to talk again, probably to calm me.  It worked and I remember him asking me what my parents do.  I told him, "my father is an inspector".  That was true, he is a quality control inspector, but the guard understood that he was in some sort of law enforcement, from the tone of my voice.  He understood that I was not liking this, but still he leaned in closer, his face near mine. 

I don't remember when or how, or what happened in between but I know that, somehow, my limbs cooperated and I was walking out the door.  He followed me, begging me to stay.  He explained again how lonely he was, his family was back in Columbia.  "Oh, I am sorry".  Why was I being so nice? 

I rushed for the door, "I really have to go now, my parents are waiting".  He tried to stop me, with nice words, with desperate words, by pulling on my arm.  "No, please stay". 

I was outside, finally, and I ran.  I ran all the way home, those whole 7km.  I was shaking.  I wanted to scream and cry.  Then I was home. 

"Ma, I went to school.  The security, he was being...funny...with me".  She looked at me, and I watched her expression turn to annoyance. 

"That's what you get for going there alone".

 


Friday, October 28, 2005

i started a PhD in an immuno lab but quit.  time to start thinking for real about my future.  STart working or continue academically?  Not sure...let's see how this pans out


Tuesday, September 20, 2005

i suck at poetry


Saturday, August 13, 2005

i have bob marley in my head right now. "no woman, no cry". i remember Matthew once pointed out that Bob might mean not having a woman in your life is a good thing cause women are bitches...or that it might mean an entirely different thing ie just because you don't have a woman doesn't mean you have to cry, so be strong.  um....wait i think that's wrong.  i think he said something else.  i'm not sure anymore. 

being at work on a saturday at 7:30pm sucks. realizing you have way too much work left to do to finish your thesis on time...priceless.  uhh...yeah. 

i just read this...awesome? or awful?

Many Scientists Admit to Misconduct

Degrees of Deception Vary in Poll; Researchers Say Findings Could Hurt the Field

By Rick Weiss

Washington Post Staff Writer
Thursday, June 9, 2005; Page A03

Few scientists fabricate results from scratch or flatly plagiarize the work of others, but a surprising number engage in troubling degrees of fact-bending or deceit, according to the first large-scale survey of scientific misbehavior.

More than 5 percent of scientists answering a confidential questionnaire admitted to having tossed out data because the information contradicted their previous research or said they had circumvented some human research protections.

Ten percent admitted they had inappropriately included their names or those of others as authors on published research reports.

And more than 15 percent admitted they had changed a study's design or results to satisfy a sponsor, or ignored observations because they had a "gut feeling" they were inaccurate.

None of those failings qualifies as outright scientific misconduct under the strict definition used by federal regulators. But they could take at least as large a toll on science as the rare, high-profile cases of clear-cut falsification, said Brian Martinson, an investigator with the HealthPartners Research Foundation in Minneapolis, who led the study appearing in today's issue of the journal Nature.

[...]

"Science has changed a lot in terms of its competitiveness, the level of funding and the commercial pressures on scientists," Martinson said. "We've turned science into a big business but failed to note that some of the rules of science don't fit well with that model."

Scientific dishonesty has long been a simmering concern. Many suspect, for example, that Gregor Mendel, the Austrian monk whose plant-breeding experiments revealed with suspicious precision the basic laws of genetics, cooked his numbers along with his peas.

In recent decades a handful of cases have risen to the level of popular attention -- the most famous, perhaps, involving David Baltimore, the Nobel laureate who in the mid-1980s heatedly defended his laboratory's honor in a series of scathing congressional hearings led by Rep. John D. Dingell (D-Mich.).

[...]

Martinson and two colleagues -- Melissa Anderson and Raymond de Vries, both of the University of Minnesota -- sent a survey to thousands of scientists funded by the National Institutes of Health and tallied the replies from the 3,247 who responded anonymously.

Just 0.3 percent admitted to faking research data, and 1.4 percent admitted to plagiarism. But lesser violations were far more common, including 4.7 percent who admitted to publishing the same data in two or more publications to beef up their résumés and 13.5 percent who used research designs they knew would not give accurate results.

[...]

A preliminary analysis of other questions in the survey, not yet published, suggests a link between misconduct and the extent to which scientists feel the system of peer review for grants and advancement is unfair. That suggests those aging systems need to be revised, the researcher said.

"Scientists say, 'This is nuts,' so they break the rules, and then respect for the rules diminishes," de Vries said. "If scientists feel that the process isn't fair and the rich get richer and the rest get nothing, then perhaps we have to think how we can reallocate resources for science."

 


Friday, August 12, 2005

www.dsphotography.ca

races #1, 46, 70, 83 and 108

 



Next 5 >>